Staying In Sync with the World of Synchronization and Timing Systems
April 1, 2021
By Jon Baldry
Director, Metro Networking
Looking back at WSTS 2021
We are just about to bring WSTS-2021 to a wrap after three days of intensive presentations and discussions around all aspects of timing and synchronization, covering every angle of the topic you can imagine. 2021 saw the 30th running of the Workshop on Synchronization and Timing Systems event, which was founded Mark Weiss in 1992. Mark is a well-known figure in the world of timing and sync, and he is still chairman of the event today and a major driving force behind its ongoing success.
There are two main synchronization and timing events each year: WSTS and the International Timing and Synchronization Forum (ITSF). WSTS is held in the U.S. in the first half of each year and ITSF is held in Europe toward the end of each year, with many steering group committee members supporting both events. This provides attendees from across the globe the best possible chance of keeping in sync with the world of synchronization and timing systems by participating in one or both events.
WSTS 2021 was a virtual event due to travel restrictions, but it was packed with almost five hours of content per day across three days, covering sync and timing for a range of industries. I presented on the first day in the main session that addressed synchronization in telecommunications networks. The session also included presenters from Ericsson, T-Mobile, Ciena, Calnex Solutions, Huawei, and Juniper Networks. My presentation covered the work we are doing with our partner Microchip on providing 5G-quality synchronization with optical timing channel-enabled vPRTC in real-world networks. If you attended the event, then I hope you enjoyed the presentation!
So, what were my main takeaways from the event?
Timing and synchronization impact a huge number of industries, not just 5G
The event addressed timing and synchronization within the telecommunications, electrical power, smart cities, financial services, and data center industries. It also addressed the building blocks of solutions such as test and measurement, timing sources, security of network time distribution, GNSS time resilience, and network time distribution without GNSS. Mark Weiss even gave a keynote presentation and demonstration along with Robert Tjoelker from NASA’s Deep Space Network team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory on deep space atomic clock capabilities. Overall, it was a very comprehensive few days covering a vast array of applications and industries.
For those of us in the telecommunications world, we often think that at the moment, synchronization is very focused toward mobile networks and 5G in particular, but synchronization distribution is required in many other industries too. Some of these touch on the telecommunications world, such as upcoming smart cities initiatives and networks supporting power utilities. Others can perhaps be initially surprising, such as synchronization within a vehicle or an aircraft, but if we think of these networks as mini-telco networks with the same challenges that we see, then perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised by this.
Overall, the takeaway that I draw from this is that while 5G might be the main focus for synchronization distribution in optical transport networks today, the need for high-quality synchronization distribution will only increase. Many of these networks already require synchronization capabilities, such as the bespoke enterprise networks that we build for power utilities for their internal traffic, but many others, such as smart city infrastructure, are just getting started. Over time, the optical networking industry will see more synchronization demands from an ever-widening array of customers and applications.
Sync distribution is complex!
To those from a non-sync background, the topic can sometimes appear to be a word soup of new terminology, acronyms, and standardization names. As a side note, we’ve recently released an e-book on synchronization distribution in 5G transport networks that can help explain all this from an optical transport networking perspective.
But there is a good reason for this synchronization word soup – it’s a complex topic that requires a lot of standardization and control. As timing and synchronization are required to solve ever more complex challenges with ever-higher performance demands, the depth of understanding around the challenges involved and the methods needed to overcome them increases too. One of the challenges we face moving forward is trying to reduce this complexity from synchronization distribution networks, which is one of the goals of the vPRTC architecture.
Optical transport still presents challenges for sync distribution
It was interesting that multiple speakers, including myself, mentioned some of the newer challenges people are discovering as operators push for 5G-quality synchronization distribution over optical transport networks, such as the timing error challenges caused by OTN framing in transport networks. Mitigation methods exist, but it was clear that it is early days for deploying these. More needs to be done to educate the market on the range of options to overcome these challenges.
Warning, potential name confusion ahead for those of us from an optical background
One very interesting presentation from Microchip’s Chief Scientist George Zampetti outlined the concept of collaborative clocks. Multiple clocks in a distributed network share metrology data, i.e., local measurements, to enable better clock performance within the cluster than is achievable by any clock individually. An example might be clocks within a smart city cluster. Importantly, these clocks do not run independently – they use coherency to run in tight association with their neighbors. One of the key elements that enables this capability is the emergence of advanced time and phase distribution over both fiber and radio technologies to provide the required high-performance interconnections. This creates the concept of a coherent timing network, which is totally unrelated to and shouldn’t be confused with a coherent optical network. Although, of course, a future coherent timing network could be underpinned by a coherent optical network!
In summary, WSTS was a very interesting event that really highlighted the complexity and depth of the topic of synchronization and timing systems and also the significant advancements that continue to be made to support the rollout of more advanced 5G mobile networks as well as networks to support a range of other industries. As I’ve outlined in the first of our blog series on synchronization, the topic is top of mind for service providers as they prepare their networks for advanced phase 2 5G services. Hopefully, we’ll be back to face-to-face events in time for ITSF in November, which promises an equally in-depth look at all things network timing and synchronization.